IT in Vehicle Logistics Management

Current IT landscapes

IT is a necessary business tool (61%), that helps in optimizing (58%) and automating (55%) processes. These are three predominant perceptions of IT in the companies surveyed. Although as many as 9% also stated that they were disappointed by IT, the overall results clearly indicate the great importance of IT for the companies surveyed.

Which of the following descriptions best reflects your perception of IT in your business?

Respondents 2023: n = 106 - Multiple selections possible.

0%

IT is a necessary business tool

0%

IT helps in optimizing processes

0%

IT helps in automating process

0%

IT helps us to improve our business

0%

IT is rucial to staying ahead of our competitors

0%

IT can be used as a sales tool to win new customers

0%

IT is overrated, too expensive and fails expectations

0%

Other

In line with the above result, almost all respondents (83%) deploy specialized software systems for vehicle logistics (see Chart 11). Just over half (54%) rely on self-developed systems, while a quarter (23%) uses standard software from third-party providers. Of the respondents who felt they belonged to the "Other" category, half (6%) opted for a mix of self-developed and standard software.

Compared to previous years, it is noticeable that no one stated that they manage logistics manually on the basis of paper for the first time. Digitalization finally seems to have fully arrived in the industry, although it is surprising that an unchanged proportion of around 10 % still has to depend on Excel-like applications.

The fact that the proportion of in-house developed systems is declining, presumably in favor of standard software or a mix of both, can often be explained by the fact that old legacy systems can no longer keep pace with the increasing demands of the industry. At the same time, the expense of new developments is often not worthwhile, especially as there is a lack of personnel for maintenance.

How are you organizing your vehicle logistics?

Respondents 2023: n = 106; 2018 = 88; 2013 = 118. The option “Other” was only available in 2023.


With a standard software system

2023

0%

2018

0%

2013

0%

With a self-developed software system

2023

0%

2018

0%

2013

0%

Using Microsoft Excel (or similar applications)

2023

0%

2018

0%

2013

0%

Manually (paper based)

2023

0%

2018

0%

2013

0%

Other

(only surveyed in 2023)

2023

0%

Among those companies that have implemented software for vehicle logistics, a very advanced quarter (27%) have been working with such a system for more than eleven years. However, the question of whether this software still meets current requirements remains unanswered for the time being but will be answered in the next chapter of this report. Over half (58%) have installed it in the last one to ten years, and only 14% have done so in the last twelve months.

When was your company’s software system for vehicle logistics implemented? (n=74)

Respondents 2023: n = 74

0%

In the last 12 month

0%

1 - 5 years ago

0%

6 - 10 years ago

0%

11 - 20 years ago

0%

More than 20 years ago

0%

Other

In the area of tracking technology, which provides the software mentioned above, systems with valuable data, barcode scanning is still in first place (53%) but has decreased significantly in frequency compared to the two previous studies from five and ten years ago. Other technologies were used more frequently than before.

Are you using identification / tracking technology?

Respondents 2023: n = 106; 2018 = 63; 2013 = 118. Multiple selections possible. In 2013, less options were given than in 2018 and 2023


Barcode

2023

0%

2018

0%

2013

0%

Truck-based GPS telematics

2023

0%

2018

0%

2013

0%

Electronic proof of delivery (ePOD)

2023

0%

2018

0%

2013

0%

RFID

2023

0%

2018

0%

2013

0%

Electronic freight documents (eCMR)

2023

0%

2018

0%

2013

0%

No, not yet

2023

0%

2018

0%

2013

0%

Vehicle-based GPS telematics

2023

0%

2018

0%

2013

0%

Other

2023

0%

2018

0%

2013

0%

Future Requirements and Developments

If we look ahead again, we can identify a number of challenges that respondents want to tackle with software (see Chart 14). Respondents almost unanimously see the following as "important" or "very important" when using IT: better data analysis (95 %), increased operational efficiency (94 %), and support for strategic and tactical decisions (94 %). If we only look at future challenges that were prioritized as "very important", we see that operational efficiency (63 %) again but also the desire for more end-to-end transparency in processes (55 %) are at the top of the list.

This corresponds with the statement that AI will be one of the important technologies of the future, but also with the general economic challenges identified (see Charts 8 and 9). While most of the requirements were largely rated the same as in the 2018 survey, it stands out that the importance of CO2-saving networks appears to have increased rapidly. Although this challenge was surveyed for the first time in 2023, more than three quarters of respondents (76 %) already rate it as important or very important.

What are the main challenges you expect to face within the next five years with respect to software systems?

Respondents 2023: n = 106; 2018 = 61


Achieve visibility and tracking

2023

0%

Very important

0%

Important

0%

Less or not important

2018

0%

Very important

0%

Important

0%

Less or not important


Better data analysis

2023

0%

Very important

0%

Important

0%

Less or not important

2018

0%

Very important

0%

Important

0%

Less or not important


Better utilization of the parking area

2023

0%

Very important

0%

Important

0%

Less or not important

2018

0%

Very important

0%

Important

0%

Less or not important


Create IT infrastructure for robotization of the yard

(only surveyed in 2023)

2023

0%

Very important

0%

Important

0%

Less or not important


Implement more paperless processes

2023

0%

Very important

0%

Important

0%

Less or not important

2018

0%

Very important

0%

Important

0%

Less or not important


Implementation of identification technology (RFID / Barcode etc.)

2023

0%

Very important

0%

Important

0%

Less or not important

2018

0%

Very important

0%

Important

0%

Less or not important


Increasing operational efficiency

2023

0%

Very important

0%

Important

0%

Less or not important

2018

0%

Very important

0%

Important

0%

Less or not important


Meet business needs e.g. time of delivery

2023

0%

Very important

0%

Important

0%

Less or not important

2018

0%

Very important

0%

Important

0%

Less or not important


More collaborated decision making with partners via web

2023

0%

Very important

0%

Important

0%

Less or not important

2018

0%

Very important

0%

Important

0%

Less or not important


More internationalization (expanding, cooperating globally)

2023

0%

Very important

0%

Important

0%

Less or not important

2018

0%

Very important

0%

Important

0%

Less or not important


Prepare for raising CO2 costs by adjusting processes and transport networks (only surveyed in 2023)

2023

0%

Very important

0%

Important

0%

Less or not important


Reduce software costs

2023

0%

Very important

0%

Important

0%

Less or not important

2018

0%

Very important

0%

Important

0%

Less or not important


Replace existing systems

2023

0%

Very important

0%

Important

0%

Less or not important

2018

0%

Very important

0%

Important

0%

Less or not important


Support for strategic and tactical decisions

2023

0%

Very important

0%

Important

0%

Less or not important

2018

0%

Very important

0%

Important

0%

Less or not important

But do the current systems cover all this satisfactorily? It doesn't look like they do, especially as dissatisfaction with the companies' own software systems for vehicle logistics increases slightly from survey to survey (see Chart 15). While 28 % of respondents were still completely satisfied in 2013, today the figure is only 11 %. A lack of reporting, data mining and analytics options (41 %) is the most common complaint, which again speaks in favor of the future use of AI. A lack of web portals for partners (40 %) and poor usability (38 %) are criticized second and third most frequently. However, it is also worth noting that a full third of respondents (33 %) do not consider their IT to be fit for the future.

However, it seems that there are some hurdles on the way to renewal (see Chart 16). In particular, perceived high investments (44 %), missing internal resources (41 %), and restricted IT budgets (39 %) are the most frequently mentioned barriers to implementing new systems. Although the data does not differ greatly from the results in 2013 and 2018, it is noticeable that internal capacities appear to be becoming increasingly scarce, which will probably argue against in-house developed systems in the future.

In your opinion, what are the weaknesses of your company’s existing software system for vehicle logistics?

Respondents 2023: n = 85; 2018 = 52; 2013 = 118. Multiple selections possible.


Limited reporting, data mining, analytics

2023

0%

2018

0%

2013

0%

No web portal to interact with partners

2023

0%

2018

0%

2013

0%

Usability could be better

2023

0%

2018

0%

2013

0%

Limited functionalities

2023

0%

2018

0%

2013

0%

It is not future-proof

2023

0%

2018

0%

2013

0%

Difficult to integrate new customer data and business processes

2023

0%

2018

0%

2013

0%

Limited automated decision support

2023

0%

2018

0%

2013

0%

Data is not visible in real-time

2023

0%

2018

0%

2013

0%

High yearly maintenance and operational costs

2023

0%

2018

0%

2013

0%

Originally designed for a different industry sector

2023

0%

2018

0%

2013

0%

No weaknesses, completely satisfied

2023

0%

2018

0%

2013

0%

Other

2023

0%

2018

0%

2013

0%

In your opinion, what are the weaknesses of your company’s existing software system for vehicle logistics?

Respondents 2023: n = 106; 2018 = 44; 2013 = 118. Multiple selections possible.


Perceived high investment

2023

0%

2018

0%

2013

0%

Missing internal resources

2023

0%

2018

0%

2013

0%

Restricted IT budgets

2023

0%

2018

0%

2013

0%

Bad experience with software implementation in the past

2023

0%

2018

0%

2013

0%

Not enough information on the benefits of new software

2023

0%

2018

0%

2013

0%

No awarness of the positive impact software has on the company

2023

0%

2018

0%

2013

0%

Other

2023

0%

2018

0%

2013

0%
Previous page
Contents
Back to top
Continue to the next page